'Weak Dependency Graph [60.0]' ------------------------------ Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to Rules: { a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1)) , r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1)) , r(x1) -> d(x1) , d(a(x1)) -> a(a(d(x1))) , d(x1) -> a(x1)} Details: We have computed the following set of weak (innermost) dependency pairs: { a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1)) , r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1))) , r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1)) , d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1)))) , d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))} The usable rules are: { a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1)) , r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1)) , r(x1) -> d(x1) , d(a(x1)) -> a(a(d(x1))) , d(x1) -> a(x1)} The estimated dependency graph contains the following edges: {a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))} ==> {r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))} {a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))} ==> {r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))} {r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))} ==> {d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))} {r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))} ==> {d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))} {r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))} ==> {d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))} {r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))} ==> {d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))} {d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))} ==> {a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))} {d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))} ==> {a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))} We consider the following path(s): 1) { a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1)) , d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1)) , r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1)) , r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1))) , d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))} The usable rules for this path are the following: { a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1)) , r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1)) , r(x1) -> d(x1) , d(a(x1)) -> a(a(d(x1))) , d(x1) -> a(x1)} We have applied the subprocessor on the union of usable rules and weak (innermost) dependency pairs. 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to Rules: { a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1)) , r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1)) , r(x1) -> d(x1) , d(a(x1)) -> a(a(d(x1))) , d(x1) -> a(x1) , a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1)) , d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1)) , r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1)) , r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1))) , d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))} and weakly orienting the rules {} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] r(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] d(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] r^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] c_3(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_4(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] Finally we apply the subprocessor We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules { r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1)) , a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1)) , r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))} and weakly orienting the rules {a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: { r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1)) , a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1)) , r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [9] r(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] d(x1) = [1] x1 + [7] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] r^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] c_3(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_4(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] Finally we apply the subprocessor We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))} and weakly orienting the rules { r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1)) , a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1)) , r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1))) , a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [13] r(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] d(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] r^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] c_3(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_4(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] Finally we apply the subprocessor We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {r(x1) -> d(x1)} and weakly orienting the rules { r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1)) , r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1)) , a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1)) , r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1))) , a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {r(x1) -> d(x1)} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] r(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] d(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [12] r^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [4] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [3] d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_3(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_4(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] Finally we apply the subprocessor We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules { d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1)) , d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))} and weakly orienting the rules { r(x1) -> d(x1) , r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1)) , r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1)) , a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1)) , r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1))) , a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: { d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1)) , d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [15] r(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] d(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] r^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [12] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [9] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_3(x1) = [1] x1 + [3] c_4(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'fastest of 'combine', 'Bounds with default enrichment', 'Bounds with default enrichment'' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: { d(a(x1)) -> a(a(d(x1))) , d(x1) -> a(x1)} Weak Rules: { d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1)) , d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1)))) , r(x1) -> d(x1) , r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1)) , r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1)) , a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1)) , r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1))) , a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))} Details: The problem was solved by processor 'Bounds with default enrichment': 'Bounds with default enrichment' -------------------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: { d(a(x1)) -> a(a(d(x1))) , d(x1) -> a(x1)} Weak Rules: { d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1)) , d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1)))) , r(x1) -> d(x1) , r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1)) , r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1)) , a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1)) , r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1))) , a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))} Details: The problem is Match-bounded by 0. The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton: { b_0(2) -> 2 , a^#_0(2) -> 5 , c_0_0(7) -> 5 , r^#_0(2) -> 7 , d^#_0(2) -> 9 , c_2_0(9) -> 7 , c_4_0(5) -> 9}