'Weak Dependency Graph [60.0]'
------------------------------
Answer: YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to
Rules:
{ a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))
, r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1))
, r(x1) -> d(x1)
, d(a(x1)) -> a(a(d(x1)))
, d(x1) -> a(x1)}
Details:
We have computed the following set of weak (innermost) dependency pairs:
{ a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))
, r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))
, r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))
, d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))
, d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))}
The usable rules are:
{ a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))
, r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1))
, r(x1) -> d(x1)
, d(a(x1)) -> a(a(d(x1)))
, d(x1) -> a(x1)}
The estimated dependency graph contains the following edges:
{a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))}
==> {r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))}
{a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))}
==> {r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))}
{r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))}
==> {d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))}
{r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))}
==> {d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))}
{r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))}
==> {d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))}
{r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))}
==> {d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))}
{d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))}
==> {a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))}
{d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))}
==> {a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))}
We consider the following path(s):
1) { a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))
, d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))
, r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))
, r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))
, d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))}
The usable rules for this path are the following:
{ a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))
, r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1))
, r(x1) -> d(x1)
, d(a(x1)) -> a(a(d(x1)))
, d(x1) -> a(x1)}
We have applied the subprocessor on the union of usable rules and weak (innermost) dependency pairs.
'Weight Gap Principle'
----------------------
Answer: YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to
Rules:
{ a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))
, r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1))
, r(x1) -> d(x1)
, d(a(x1)) -> a(a(d(x1)))
, d(x1) -> a(x1)
, a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))
, d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))
, r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))
, r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))
, d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))}
Details:
We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
{a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))}
and weakly orienting the rules
{}
using the following strongly linear interpretation:
Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
{a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))}
Details:
Interpretation Functions:
a(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
b(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
r(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
d(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
r^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
c_3(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_4(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
Finally we apply the subprocessor
We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
{ r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1))
, a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))
, r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))}
and weakly orienting the rules
{a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))}
using the following strongly linear interpretation:
Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
{ r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1))
, a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))
, r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))}
Details:
Interpretation Functions:
a(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
b(x1) = [1] x1 + [9]
r(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
d(x1) = [1] x1 + [7]
a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
r^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
c_3(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_4(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
Finally we apply the subprocessor
We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
{r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))}
and weakly orienting the rules
{ r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1))
, a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))
, r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))
, a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))}
using the following strongly linear interpretation:
Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
{r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))}
Details:
Interpretation Functions:
a(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
b(x1) = [1] x1 + [13]
r(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
d(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
r^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
c_3(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_4(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
Finally we apply the subprocessor
We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
{r(x1) -> d(x1)}
and weakly orienting the rules
{ r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))
, r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1))
, a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))
, r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))
, a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))}
using the following strongly linear interpretation:
Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
{r(x1) -> d(x1)}
Details:
Interpretation Functions:
a(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
b(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
r(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
d(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [12]
r^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [4]
c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [3]
d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_3(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_4(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
Finally we apply the subprocessor
We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
{ d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))
, d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))}
and weakly orienting the rules
{ r(x1) -> d(x1)
, r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))
, r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1))
, a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))
, r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))
, a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))}
using the following strongly linear interpretation:
Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
{ d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))
, d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))}
Details:
Interpretation Functions:
a(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
b(x1) = [1] x1 + [15]
r(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
d(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
r^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [12]
c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
d^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [9]
c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_3(x1) = [1] x1 + [3]
c_4(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
Finally we apply the subprocessor
'fastest of 'combine', 'Bounds with default enrichment', 'Bounds with default enrichment''
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Answer: YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem: innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to
Strict Rules:
{ d(a(x1)) -> a(a(d(x1)))
, d(x1) -> a(x1)}
Weak Rules:
{ d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))
, d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))
, r(x1) -> d(x1)
, r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))
, r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1))
, a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))
, r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))
, a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))}
Details:
The problem was solved by processor 'Bounds with default enrichment':
'Bounds with default enrichment'
--------------------------------
Answer: YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem: innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to
Strict Rules:
{ d(a(x1)) -> a(a(d(x1)))
, d(x1) -> a(x1)}
Weak Rules:
{ d^#(x1) -> c_4(a^#(x1))
, d^#(a(x1)) -> c_3(a^#(a(d(x1))))
, r(x1) -> d(x1)
, r^#(x1) -> c_2(d^#(x1))
, r(a(x1)) -> d(r(x1))
, a^#(b(x1)) -> c_0(r^#(x1))
, r^#(a(x1)) -> c_1(d^#(r(x1)))
, a(b(x1)) -> b(r(x1))}
Details:
The problem is Match-bounded by 0.
The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton:
{ b_0(2) -> 2
, a^#_0(2) -> 5
, c_0_0(7) -> 5
, r^#_0(2) -> 7
, d^#_0(2) -> 9
, c_2_0(9) -> 7
, c_4_0(5) -> 9}